|
|
|
|
|
|
by evilpie
4136 days ago
|
|
|
As one of the biggest Firefox contributors, I am actually annoyed by how bad this decision is from a technical point of view as well. We have already seen malware that just replaces the Chrome binary to avoid add-on checks, but somehow this isn't seen as a big problem? > That is possible, but I don’t expect the majority of
malware developers to go through such trouble. [1] I can totally understand where this idea is coming from, but trying to somehow secure Firefox on a system that is already busted is futile. [1] https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/02/10/extension-signing... |
|
|