|
|
|
|
|
by philh
4140 days ago
|
|
No one knows for certain, but... suppose you have two projects and can fund one of them. Project A wants to investigate in as much depth as possible (given their budget) the effects of nail-biting on arthritis. Project B wants to investigate in as much depth as possible (given their budget) the effects of learning a programming language on Alzheimer's disease. I know which of these seems like a better choice for funding, even though I don't really know for certain what the long-term impact of either will be. |
|
In support of project A: fibromyalgia, which has arthritic-type symptoms, is partly linked to anxiety, of which one of the common manifestation is nail-biting. Could evidence of nail-biting be a useful tool as part of differential diagnosis, or a predictor?
In support of project B: the idea of a 'cognitive reserve' in preventing the onset of Alzheimer's disease is fairly well established, even though it has no disease-modifying therapy once the symptoms of decline are already apparent. To what extent can learning a programming language aid that cognitive reserve?
I see your point though, but I'm not sure how well it applies to funding large-scale data collection work like the HGP. Or the LHC, to use an example in another field.