Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by joeythibault 6072 days ago
hahah, at least it's a good demonstration of the possibilities. Honestly I think the best personal use I will find is with my morning emails exchanges with a few friends on the east coast (about 25 emails go back and forth every morning, including links, videos, etc.). We just to do it with a blog but that didn't fit. Chat is too time consuming, but Wave might be just right.

At least it'll make procrastinating more efficient.

1 comments

Well,

It could also be a demonstration of the limitations. The question with Wave is: will it live up to the hype and replace a wide swath of other communications protocols or will it just be one more protocol? Everything I'm hearing makes it seem like it will be the latter, which is fine, especially if you like D & D.

will it live up to the hype and replace a wide swath of other communications protocols

It's not like POP killed IRC, or HTTP killed SMTP. Different protocols do different things. What serious candidates would there be for Wave to kill?

Heresy! Techcrunch has taught us well that the only way for a new service/protocol/whatever to be born is by tearing its way free out the entrails of another, more mature, not-as-hot-right-now protocol.

Sorry for the imagery, I just thought it fit with the D&D theme :)

Some different protocols do different things. But XMPP, particularly wrapped in the Wave implementation, can do many, many things.

Wave might catch on as little more than an open-source alternative to, say, Sharepoint and Biztalk. (collaboration and workflow automation being the most obvious non-communication uses).

But I don't see why people would stop short and not replace their SMTP/Jabber/IRC/RSS use with Wave once they and everyone they need to work with is using it.

merging Skype and mail sounds good though. If Skype put out a mail client, I'd probably use it.