|
|
|
|
|
by daturkel
4139 days ago
|
|
This was posted almost a year ago and enjoyed a decent conversation in the comments [0] I'll repeat my comment from the time: "For what it's worth, the presence of seemingly significant signal in the difference between the original and compressed tracks does not necessarily mean that significant sonic/perceptual loss has occurred. Operating correctly, the encoder is designed to cut not just sounds that the human ear cannot hear in general (e.g. sounds above 22kHZ) but also sounds which may not be perceptible in context (e.g. the quietest signals in a loud section). So if you find something beautiful about the ghost tracks (and I think there is something beautiful to find), don't immediately jump to concluding that mp3 is awful for cutting these sounds—they might be hardly perceptible when added to the mix. Of course, at high-compression rates mp3 does begin to significantly degrade fidelity. Edit: all of this is not to put down the project—I still think it's pretty cool as art and as a demonstration of the encoder, I just didn't want people to think that this was some sort of massive failing of mp3." [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7955917 |
|