|
|
|
|
|
by aturon
4137 days ago
|
|
> That said, I'm not sure what the exact reason was for choosing the syntax, as that was before my time. I think the reason is just that it's very concise, and lightweight closure syntax makes things like `Option::map` feel like first-class parts of the language. The closure you pass just sort of seamlessly "blends in". Note that having especially sugary here is not so uncommon, for example Haskell has `\x -> blah` for Rust's `|x| blah`. I'm personally very happy that the closure syntax is as concise as it is. |
|