Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DavidPlumpton 4137 days ago
Try writing a complex program in 1960s era COBOL. Then you will understand a large part of Lisp's claim to fame.
1 comments

Perhaps, but when you add alternates like Algol and PL/1 (1964) that case becomes a lot weaker. (Although I don't really know Algol and only know PL/1 as of IBM's late '70s version.) The weaknesses of COBOL were widely realized (and in it's niches it's not hardly so bad, or so I say from one week of using it).