|
|
|
|
|
by slowmovintarget
4150 days ago
|
|
Why is it reasonable to expect Patreon to manage compliance and liability for such a law? If the EU wants to destroy commerce, that should be within the province of its citizens to address... oh wait. There's the problem. |
|
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vat-supplying-dig...
Per this law, the third party marketplace/gateway is responsible for compliance and liability. That is how everyone in the EU affected by the law views it, and it is why most marketplaces and platforms are slowly but surely coming into compliance.
This particular marketplace, on the other hand, hired a consultancy firm whose raison d'etre is tax avoidance http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-31147276, who proceeded to give them what they paid for. That tax advice was so incredibly wrong it was almost laughable; it misrepresented the "place of supply", the fundamental piece of information behind the entire continental tax change. https://idea15.wordpress.com/2015/01/20/vatmoss-place-of-ser...
This issue is not a question of extraterritorial sovereignty or individual responsibility. It's about dodgy tax advisors giving dodgy advice to a company which paid good money for it.