[ScottBurson]

JavaScript didn't really get it right:

  var a = 1;

  function four() {
    if (true) {
      var a = 4;
    }

    alert(a); // alerts '4', not the global value of '1'
  }

Also, if you omit 'var', the code is still legal (except in strict mode), and the variable winds up in the global scope, which is a recipe for disaster.

Still, it's nice that 'var' exists in JS at all. The idea that variable declarations are unnecessary noise and should be elided -- an idea that dates back at least to BASIC -- is, in my opinion, one of the worst seductive ideas in programming language design. Unless your language has only a single global scope (like BASIC), it always causes problems -- and we know that block scope is important for nontrivial programs.

Elvish sounds interesting; I will have to check it out.

[hyperpape]

I don't think we know that. We know some notion of lexical scope is valuable, but function only vs block scope seems like an issue of familiarity/style.

[ScottBurson]

Okay, but that doesn't change my point that a single global scope is archaic, and for good reason.