|
|
|
|
|
by etchalon
4153 days ago
|
|
It actually requires neither. As many lawyers have pointed out in various threads, the defense team could have claimed the server was Ulbricht's property before trial, and had the motion failed, denied so during trial - so long as he never testified. I suppose it is slightly weird, but it kinda makes sense from a "lawyered!" perspective. |
|