[nbaman_23]

Being a minute late to a meter shouldn't constitute a $60+ fine. If being a "leech" means recuperating exorbitant fines that are primarily in place to increase revenue (so more money can be wasted), then count me in. I'm not trying to spend money allocated for my water and gas bills to pay a ticket that was issued for parking at a meter one minute after it had expired. I understand that yes, an honest mistake was made, but it didn't cause $60+ worth of inconveniences to the city.

[Kalium]

The fines aren't there to increase revenue, though that's a perk. They are there to encourage you to make do without a car in SF.

[nbaman_23]

This isn't S.F. but check out the reason Oakland decided to hike fines (http://www.oaklandnet.com/government/fwawebsite/parking/park...). I wouldn't be surprised if S.F. and most other cities view revenue from parking fines the same way Oakland does. Here it is:

Q: Why did the City of Oakland raise parking meter fees, increase fines and extend and parking meter enforcement hours?

A: The City of Oakland’s recent decision to raise parking meter fees and increase some fines was made in response to the most serious financial crisis ever faced by the City, and it accompanied significant cuts to vital public services, including police, libraries, parks and maintenance. Although City leaders recognize that this decision is unpopular and difficult for many residents, it was an unfortunate necessity given the magnitude of Oakland’s budget deficit.

[ulfw]

I just don't get how mismanaged California, it's counties and cities really are. The SF Bay Area is the richest, most booming part of the whole country. Oakland even is getting more sought after (as spillover from completely unaffordable SF). Yet: " in response to the most serious financial crisis ever faced by the City"

So WHEN if EVER are those cities not in a financial crisis?