I thought their convention for arbitrary project names was always using two words with no intentional revelance to the actual scope of the project (with projects like Prism being the exception).
Then again, some of their names are so blatantly fitting (and offensive) that that claim doesn't seem very believable in the first place.
Then again, some of their names are so blatantly fitting (and offensive) that that claim doesn't seem very believable in the first place.