Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Touche 4152 days ago
Isn't Patreon just charity? I don't think that's a sustainable way to pay for content.
3 comments

No, it isn't charity; it's payment for content. Calling it "charity" implies that the content being provided has no value to the person paying for it.
No, it's patronage, and it appeared to work for a few hundred years.
Not sustainable? Tell that to PBS!
Sustainable is the wrong word. Is it scalable? Meaning can a large number of creators live off of this model?
Time will tell, but I can't see any reason to doubt whether this could scale. As long as an artist can inspire intense loyalty from a small group of fans, they could forseeably supplement their income with donations. This won't work for all artists, and won't replace existing funding models. But there are a lot of creators who fit this bill.

I, for one, and excited to see crowd-patronage grow. It's a model that rewards artists with cult appeal (versus the consumer model, which values mass appeal). The arts will be a little less bland.

See my other reply that's like a great-great-uncle-once-removed of this comment or something, and I'd highlight I'm using real numbers from my real patronage, not theoretical things that could happen someday.