[chromatic]

I'm interested in why you removed "stagnate and die" from that quote.

I have strong opinions that people in situations similar to mine had no intent of contributing to "stagnation" or "death". Quite the opposite.

When the process of change and renewal is shut down or nobody contributes to it, everyone starts wandering off and the project dies.

Certainly. I also think that a project which actively chases away contributors ought to account for that eventually.

[brrt]

I think that the perl6 project is quite welcoming of contributors. So I'm honestly curious to know what happened to make you feel otherwise.

[kbenson]

Chromatic was very big with both Perl 6 and Parrot development a long time ago. My understanding of it, having followed both projects for close to a decade, is that it came down to what was the "right" choice for one project was not the "right" choice for the other, and the schism this caused as it happened a few times left some people soured. I think both sides had cause for their actions and have cause for their feelings, but I don't really think either party did anything wrong. Such is life, shit happens, it's not fair.

Chromatic may disagree more or less on some points above, but as someone who followed along from the outside, reading blog posts and IRC chats of both parties over years, that's how I interpreted it.

[chromatic]

I've already written about that at length several times here and elsewhere.