|
|
|
|
|
by barsoap
4151 days ago
|
|
I guess you wouldn't, you'd have a sort function afterwards. ...for Unix' insistence on composability, the shell tools are often unnecessarily monolithic, probably because that's the only sane way if the only type you have in interconnect is `string`. |
|
Here, you'd need to either parametrize the return type of ls to get simple strings (which is what you want most of time) or additional metadata, or alternatively to have different ls commands.