|
|
|
|
|
by jlarsen
4156 days ago
|
|
I agree! There are quite a few provably insecure algorithms in the project. That said, I do think they are useful to keep around: As a reference, for legacy systems, or to practice cracking. It'd be a little silly to not add AES-256 since I already have AES-128, but I will definitely look into adding CAST5 and CSPRNGs. |
|