|
|
|
|
|
by jbert
6082 days ago
|
|
> perhaps you could put it into some non-volatile heat sink, but unless it's a really big heatsink, you wouldn't want to be anywhere near that thing when it went into resistor mode Specific heat capacity of water ~= 4(KJ per Kg per Kelvin) so, assuming we can safely take water from 20 degC to 90decC, we'd need 21MJ / 4KJ/K/degC / 70degC == 75Kg of water as a heatsink. Or about the weight of one passenger. Double or triple up for safety factors (avoid steam) and you're still OK. Have some insulation and drive some A/C to chill the water further and you're also OK. So yes, dump it into a resistive load immersed in a tank of water? (Edit, that said I do think that The Right Way to do transport+energy etc is for us to find our correct "limitless" source of energy (fusion or orbital solar, I guess) and turn that into synthetic hydrocarbons as a convenient, relatively safe, energy dense fuel. i.e. we don't build massive supergrids for pushing that power to people over wires. We pump the power into a CO2+H2O=>petrol converter which we then ship around the world using the existing infrastructure. We also don't need to retool the whole world's transport infrastructure. Obviously all carbon-neutral too. (Carbon -ve if you've got the spare power.)) |
|