Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wpietri 4170 days ago
Huh. So now you're against new meanings?
1 comments

No. I'm saying it's fine for people to stick to the usage they prefer, which may organically bring about a change, but there's no need to be critical of other people for using what is a commonly understood usage.
Well in that case, you're wrong. There is a need, and it's to have words for meanings. Language is a commons, and we all get to discuss how it's used.
"commonly understood usage"

That means they do have meaning. I'm sorry if you had trouble understanding the meaning of the words in the post. I think everyone else got it, though.

You misread what I wrote. I'm not talking about words having meanings. I'm talking about having words for meanings.