|
|
|
|
|
by Devthrowaway80
4162 days ago
|
|
You don't object to innocent people being tortured to death? If there was no societal impact, would those objections be enough for you to oppose torture? "My main objection to driving drunk is not the whole 'running over pedestrians' thing, which does happen, but more the effect that it has on my paint job - I come home with all sorts of scuff marks." |
|
Yes, I do object to that. Every single point I made against torture, I obviously support.
But hinging the entire anti-torture argument on innocents isn't going to be enough, sadly. Because of ambiguities about who exactly is innocent, and because of the relative ethics of torturing one possibly innocent victim in order to save potentially huge numbers of other innocents, a more profound argument is needed - one that covers the entire spectrum where torture is used.
In my opinion, this argument has to be about what torture turns us into.
Your interpretation of my comment is both very uncharitable and factually wrong.