|
|
|
|
|
by venaoy
4161 days ago
|
|
Clearly you have no idea how secure or tamper resistant chip technology works. To prevent such brute force approaches, they are designed to limit the maximum number of attempts, before they permanently disable themselves, which prevents you from trying all combinations. As to liability, I have pointed out in this HN thread multiple instances where customers are in fact held liable (60-day rule, stolen PIN). |
|
Your 1 example requires the person to not check their statement for 2 months. That means there is a 2 month safety window. Do you have numbers on how many people actually have that problem vs the numbers for the ones it works fine for? I would put money on the former being less than a hundredth of a percent
Your second one has been debunked where you originally posted it