|
|
|
|
|
by mapt
4172 days ago
|
|
So if I offer a trade, and then withdraw the trade because I decide I don't like the idea anymore (or 'any other reason')... that's legal. And routine to do on microsecond timescales. But offering a trade, and then withdrawing the trade manually a few seconds later because I never intended to execute the trade... that's not legal? What was the original rational for creating this class of thoughtcrime? Why does it criminalize intent, while the action is perfectly routine, and the outcomes are the same either way? There is, after all, the risk of someone actually calling your bluff and buying your sell order, or selling into your buy order, which is cleared instantly... so where's the fraud?. Doesn't HTF presuppose that we are hard-coding this behavior, this tactic, into the trading algorithms of automated traders? |
|
Yes that's right. So quickly you may as well assume that they are updating the price they are willing to buy/sell continuously in realtime. Which is the idea. And because they are updating their prices continuously and accurately, they can keep the gap between those two prices as small as possible. For some bizarre reason, this is the only field in all of technology where HN contributors get freaked out by this. Name a control system that doesn't update its outputs frequently.
>But offering a trade, and then withdrawing the trade manually a few seconds later because I never intended to execute the trade... that's not legal?
Yes that's right. Markets work on trust, if you don't actually want to buy/sell what you're claiming you want to buy/sell then you are lying. More importantly, if you don't want to trade, what are you doing putting the order in? What does that leave as your motivation? Manipulation, that's what. Which is illegal. It's very hard to define market manipulation, but that's just about the easiest way I can think of - can you think of a simpler definition? They have to settle on some way of describing it, and it's not unusual for crimes to be defined by intent.
>Doesn't HTF presuppose that we are hard-coding this behavior, this tactic, into the trading algorithms of automated traders?
I don't follow