Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ajanuary 4181 days ago
That part of the article isn't particularly clear. The intended behavior of let is great. The unintended behavior - that it can cause typeof to fail - is bad.
1 comments

It seems to me typeof in the described case should return undefined.
typeof is never being invoked, so it can't return anything.

The rules of let are that any reference to the variable before the let declaration (the "temporal dead zone"), it's a reference error. So the reference error is being thrown before typeof is invoked.