A news story just broke in which people were killed because of certain images. Is it not good journalism to show the images that caused the attack?
Or not showing naked leaked photos of Jennifer Lawrence.
Copyright is directly against "absolute freedom of speech"
I can't go and print the latest Game of Thrones book and claim "freedom of speech". We do have actual laws that prevent us to print something.
Nobody gets upset when they replace the word "nigger" with the phrase "the 'N' word", so why get upset over this?
"He was shot because he called him the N word" vs "He was shot because he published these images".
I understand the former pretty easily but the latter I'd want to know what the images contained (especially from a news organization).
They don't publish sample pictures alongside stories of child porn arrests, either. They self censor things like this all the time.
Do you think they should show Jennifer Lawrence leaked photos just because it's part of the news story about iCloud breach? I don't think so.
I don't agree with the images (and I think they are in bad taste) but I'd expect a news organization to report it impartially.
Or not showing naked leaked photos of Jennifer Lawrence.