[igrekel]

Maybe its is inclusive but it isn't Charlie like. And its a lie, most people do not have the guts to be Charlie, I certainly don't. We censor ourselves: they win.

Charlie Hebdo was not made to hurt people or a religion, it always pointed out the obvious stupidities, contradictions of the world, them being religious or not. It also had the message of never taking things too seriously.

I often disagreed with Charlie, often was disgusted by their drawings... but they made one think. The muslims I am with are far more offended and disgusted by the killings made in their name than by the crazy drawings. And publishing them still isn't as bad as bombing people, preventing people from getting jobs because of racism etc. A lot of the drawings were not of the prophet himself but of caricatured radical muslims.

[TuringTest]

Oh, I agree, and I'm not opposed at all to publishing such kind of jokes. What I object is the idea by the OP that this should be done in order to hurt the vandals that killed people because of those drawings; Charlie Hebdo's drawings themselves were not made with that intent. Publicising the images out ofspite doesn't hurt the terrorists, it makes them stronger.