[laurent123456]

Thanks for the link. I was wondering how they rationalize this decision of censoring themselves, but it actually makes sense, especially this part - "Other publications can defend – and defend absolutely – the necessary diversity of press voices along with an editor’s right to offend. But the best response is not to be forced to speak in a different voice."

[louhike]

You should replace the example of a neonazi journalist. It is a really bad one considering a lot of people consider wrongly Charlie Hebdo as a racist journal (one of the people killed was a corrector, Mustapha Ourad, and did not have the french nationality).