|
|
|
|
|
by kyllo
4183 days ago
|
|
The one advantage I see to having borderline-ridiculous packages such as this is that they do One Thing Well Sure, but one function per package is silly. Why not just put all the related utility functions in one package? Underscore does One Thing Well too. And if I really, really care about optimizing for small JS file size, I can just go in my Underscore.js file and remove all the functions I don't want to use. |
|
It's nice to have the option.