"There are two types of encryption: one that will prevent your sister from reading your diary and one that will prevent your government." -- Bruce Schneier.
Doesn't the OP sort of invalidate this? Any government should find it reasonably easy to install this kind of a keylogger on your computer. It would be quite easy to get a few minutes alone with your laptop.
As the article points out, this is easy to circumvent by removing the hard drive from your laptop. It adds a few minutes to the attack, and requires that the attacker bring a laptop, but you're still hosed.
Not my hard drive, the disk itself is fully encrypted and won't work in other laptops without that bios password (I also use a truecrypt-like thing at the filesystem level). The main attack I need to worry about is someone replacing the keyboard, etc.
Are you using a hard drive password? Those are easily crackable as well as they usually have a vendor supplied master password. Do you mind giving more details?
Most corporate laptops support it, IBM/Leonova do.
The problem is how do you know there isn't a master password (for AMI's bios it used to be "AMIBIOS") how do you know their encryption is any good (there was an enterprise tape vendor that advertised DES encryption but actually just XORed the data with your password)
And finally how do you know they haven't done exactly the same trick but replaced your bios with one that includes a keylogger?
> Sigh - privacy in the age of information seems to be an impossible dream.
Well, it's better than before: Non-electronic documents are arguably much easier to steal. At least with encryption, breaking into your house isn't necessarily enough to get your data.
Addendum: "Provided it's implemented well".