|
|
|
Ask HN: Should I post mediocre and/or small projects on GitHub?
|
|
4 points
by lystergic
4182 days ago
|
|
Having 1.5 years left on my CS degree (of 5 years in total in Sweden) I wonder how potential employers rate the amount of content vs quality - when using GitHub as an extension to my regular resume? I have developed quite a few programs varying in quality and size over the years. I however feel that for every program I develop I find that my previous programs lack in quality, and sometimes I even get a sense of shame in having written that code. This prevents me from submitting anything to GitHub at all, thinking that I will regret it later as I learn more. There is also the problem of documentation - large portions of code that I write lack comments, as at the time of writing the code seems "obvious". So what do you think? Is it worth re-working the code, adding comments & code refactoring in order to present some sort of portfolio or should I wait until I feel I have reached a level of maturity and standard of quality? |
|
Most employers don't care. Of the ones that will, most will only give your code a cursory glance just to make sure you're not a drooling imbecile. For those employers who actually look and actually care, maybe, have one really shiny project and refer to it your resume. Really work on some final projects and consider posting those. Although, if you do add documentation and comments, etc, then your projects will be more attractive to the open source community as a whole (which will, of course, make you look better to employers.) But do it if you want to, not because you feel you need to.