|
|
|
|
|
|
by jamesmiller5
4189 days ago
|
|
|
The article specifically states that an arbitrary measurement of "professional" fitness is the problem. How would a ranking system be any different than a credential system? A more effective solution at finding the right candidates is an educational system available to all. |
|
|
Yes, will be good. Also important is the free movement of talent to where it is needed.
>arbitrary
Not all ranking is arbitrary. A lot of it is targetted for the skillset a job needs. What I find arbitrary is quotas. I see this in medicine and actuarial science. Where instead of basic competency, they take the top x %.