|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
4184 days ago
|
|
You made a technical correction. It's just daft to say that your reply doesn't have to meet the same standards as the comment you're replying to. Joking doesn't matter when you're deliberately making a serious reply. Image ensures that it's comic sans if it works at all. Downvotes don't waste space, I don't see the issue. You're the one asking for meta comments. You care way too much about karma for a single comment, you have plenty. And yes don't reply to a joke by correcting it to nobody's benefit. "Browsers suck" is not a fringe case. And I don't think it's hypocritical to use pedantry in response to pedantry, which you started by 'correcting' a practice that works just fine here. |
|
Eh? edit: oh, you think a sizeable market share of browsers don't support @font-face? Well you'd be wrong about that as well. Heck, even Google don't support browsers that pre-date @font-face.
> And I don't think it's hypocritical to use pedantry in response to pedantry
It is: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define:hypocacy#q=define:h...
> which you started by 'correcting' a practice that works just fine here.
It wasn't a correction, it was an expansion. I wasn't trying to disprove the original comment, just offer an alternative.
You seem to make a habit of misreading my comments - which is ironic when the whole reason you're kicking off is because you felt I misread a joke.