|
|
|
|
|
by jordigh
4192 days ago
|
|
Oh, wow, functional programming without the oddities of Haskell syntax! I'm definitely intrigued. What's the current licensing situation? I would prefer a copyleft license, but if it already had a free license, I don't really care if it's similar to a BSD license or not. Edit: Ah, found it: http://www.shenlanguage.org/license.html Wow, this looks awful. It's a vanity license with language that is very unfamiliar to me. Can a license declare something to be legal or not, isn't that for judges to decide, not licenses? It has a bunch of weird clauses that I don't want to try to understand, and Wikipedia claims this is GPL-incompatible and non-free software. Yuck. Yeah, ok, I'm kinda interested in a free license now. |
|
The concept of the license is OK, the author wants a "Write Once, Run Anywhere" landscape where you can't break the spec and therefore other people's code, but the implementation is bad enough a lot of people including myself gave up on investing in the language and ecosystem.