|
|
|
|
|
by laumars
4190 days ago
|
|
> Are you saying Microsoft should have blah blah blah... No, I'm not saying Microsoft should have done anything specific. My post quite clearly says that a lot of useful software was still easily available to those who's internet access was a premium; and nothing more. However now I think about it, I'm pretty sure I got my copy of Internet Explorer 4 (the one that integrated IE's Triedent engine into Windows Explorer) from a .Net magazine* cover CD. So it's not like browsers weren't also distributed via the aforementioned method. (*not to be confused with Microsoft .NET) > Where and how do they draw the line to being a useful distribution and alienating their users? For example, certain ICMP utilities were included by default with Windows. Now you're just arguing for the sake of having an argument. |
|