|
|
|
|
|
by dmix
4200 days ago
|
|
If there is a kernel privilege escalation then SELinux can be disabled as Spender loves to demonstrate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI0FXZUsLuI GRSec does includes it's own MAC system as an alternative to SELinux but that is only a small part. PaX/grsec is in a different class of mitigation. I don't really know any competitors besides other implementations of small subsets by different operating systems or hardware manufacturers. To your other point, I don't think anyone who has been following Linux security for any amount of time thinks that Spender or PaX are in need of proving themselves. |
|
No major distro carries the patch, and the kernel devs don't want to merge it as it is.
A change in tactics is needed - make it easier for everyone to see how much better things with grsec are. The tweets are good, a summary of those tweets would be better.