Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hughw 4196 days ago
Literally?
3 comments

Literally means figuratively too now, didn't you get the memo? (yes, I agree it's annoying, though I've probably done it myself more than once).
Webster's:

"Since some people take sense 2 to be the opposite of sense 1, it has been frequently criticized as a misuse. Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis, but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary." [1]

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literally

Using the word that way, in parentheses, is not something I have ever encountered when intending to express hyperbole.
Thank you for looking that up and providing the reference. The M-W argument is flawed when the bit that "literally" modifies already is hyperbole. "Abuse of language sends me through the roof" is hyperbole. "Abuse of language literally sends me through the roof" is just ridiculous.

(Edited to clarify)

I have to drive through six inches of crude every time I go to the market, don't you?