|
|
|
|
|
by crucialfelix
4201 days ago
|
|
no, its much harder to get gear set up to dup cassettes at any kind of scale. that's exactly why they are doing it. CD dup is much much much faster, it only takes a few minutes to burn. cassettes are real time, or at best 2x. bigger tape dup machines can dup by projecting radio waves at the tape and do it 100x. but the cafes and internet shops in that are that do pirate copies don't have those. they just do USB sticks and CD rips. its also a kind of throwback retro thing - cassettes in Africa have been a way of life for a long time and the older generation misses the joy of buying a tape. The labels doing this are real labels recording real bands in proper studios. Its expensive to record and release a record. > I love the image of reverting to cassette tape as an illustration of DRM: intentionally selling an inferior product - because you buisiness model no longer fits with reality. Just to be honest, as a musician I find this kind of statement rather rude. |
|
>> I love the image of reverting to cassette tape as an illustration of DRM: intentionally selling an inferior product - because you buisiness model no longer fits with reality.
> Just to be honest, as a musician I find this kind of statement rather rude.
How's that? CDs worked fine w/o DRM. LPs work fine w/o DRM.
Regressing to lossy media in order to extort (as opposed to solicit) money from fans seems regressive to me. It's a little like banning radio plays of songs, because people can (and did/do?) tape radio... while this is all more akin to libraries:if the product is any good -- free copies/samples will lead to more sales.