Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cwyers 4204 days ago
I have a hard time getting too worked up over this in the case of Amazon, because I have a heck of a time getting them to stream even SD content without horrible buffering issues.
2 comments

That's why I pay for Prime (and Netflix, et. al.), and torrent the content.

Admittedly, I feel a little bad about paying providers of DRMed content, it sends the wrong market signal. But if I didn't pay these content providers, I wouldn't have a mechanism of signalling that I enjoy watching certain TV shows and movies.

I agree with the concept of buying a license to the actual content and then consuming it however you want, which ought to be the way the world actually works.

However, if you don't actually stream the content from Prime / Netflix / et. al., my guess is that they probably aren't paying out accordingly on the back end.

If you cancel your subscriptions will you delete your torrented content?

What if content is removed from Netflix?

I get what you're saying, but this is the edge case. I applaud GP for doing the right thing in the 95% case.
It's not really an edge case, is it?

Does a netflix subscription give you rights to torrent movies that exist on Netflix?

If so, what happens when they no longer exist.

Does the parent commenter check Netflix first before downloading a torrent?

I'm not passing judgement, but merely pointing out that a netflix subscription doesn't grant you the license to download and store content, in fact, it's likely expressly forbidden in the TOS.

ETA:

Not to sound self righteous, I torrented a copy of TES4: Oblivion for the PC day-1, after buying it from Amazon. It was being shipped, but I wanted to play it immediately.

>Does a netflix subscription give you rights to torrent movies that exist on Netflix?

When did anything remove my right to copy data freely anyway? Copyright is an illegitimate joke.

That's an ignorant view of copyright.

I'm a photographer, and I prefer to keep control of my work. I'm glad copyright laws exist to prevent others from using my art without properly gaining consent.

Sure you can feel like you can copy my photos, but then others should be able to copy your source code. After all, it's just data.

And in the case of Netflix HD it's not buffering, it just dynamically drops down to super-low res for however long it needs to which is kind of worse, you're not even getting what you pay for. Not that it's necessarily Netflix's fault, it's just inherent to streaming. Which makes the push for 4K streaming a puzzling choice at best.
Right, we already have incredibly bitrate-starved 1080p. But now you can have four times as many pixels for your compression artifacts!