|
|
|
|
|
by Rooster61
4204 days ago
|
|
I think I would agree with you more if we were talking about Java on a full implementation basis (actually using the nuances of the language at a high level vs just learning the basic concepts such as variables and control structures common to most languages). I also found Turing machines and automata much easier than conventional math classes. The point I was making was not that they are necessarily harder, but rather that they require a different type of mathematical thinking than your typical algebra based math. I would wager the same true for discreet math. As for functional languages, I admittedly have never programmed in one and perhaps spoke out of personal ignorance. I have, however, heard from colleagues that back my original statement. It's basically hearsay, so take it or leave it. |
|