|
|
|
|
|
|
by pc86
4205 days ago
|
|
|
> One thing being untrue does not prove/disprove a larger point. That's what what he said. What he said was that because the author made a claim that is empirically, provably false, it shows the author didn't reach a level of research that would show them that the claim was false. It brings into question other claims the author has made. |
|
|