[robinricard]

For all of the issues I have been facing, most of them were actually triggered by virtualbox. Those issues can be quite annoying but can be solved quite easily if you don't have other VB VMs. Usually, resetting the vbox subnets (I had major issues with those) does the job. On the other side, Vagrant has got some minor issues but let's face it: doing what Vagrant does manually is huge and I prefer composing with those issues than being on my own. When VB works well and don't cause any problem, you can do quite complex setups with Vagrant. I already created a swarm of 5 VMs on my machine to test my deployments locally: Vagrant may not be imperatively useful for developers but I think it's essential for everyone working on deployment and having the devs using it too can greatly improve the life of those deploying the apps. One last point: Vagrant is not made for production and I think Hashicorp has been pretty clear on that. I never tested packer/terraform or consul so I won't say anything on the production-side of what they're doing but I won't judge it until I actually used it. Vagrant may have evolved since the last time you used it, you should give it another chance !

[joesmo]

I would consider using it again if I really had to for more than just quickly testing a VM, but to be honest, after wasting days with problems (which the vagrant team is aware of) and then having it fail again and again, I'm not very inclined to. I can see why vagrant encourages a workflow where one destroys the VMs regularly as that would likely avoid a ton of issues at the expense of time wasted.

My VMWare machines have been problem free for many months (as well as my manual VBox ones for years) and the only way I'd even consider using it daily again by choice again is to try out their VMWare support ... which is unfortunately paid so I doubt that will happen. On the other hand, using vagrant did point out some severe weaknesses in VirtualBox itself, especially the file syncing support, and made me realize VMWare is worth the money for that alone. I still use vagrant once in awhile if I only need to test a project out for an hour or two.

As far as deployment, I could see the potential time savings when dealing with multiple VMs but those would only be realized if they're not offset by a longer time spent dealing with bugs. Still, I may give it another shot in that context when the need arises next.