|
|
|
|
|
by boombard
4219 days ago
|
|
I agree, it's not perfect - just a useful abstraction. Just the same as arbitrary thresholds for correlation or a p<0.05 significance level - often you lose information but gain insight. From personal experience I've seen MST's map out underlying structures that validate classical chemical kinetics of a system in a logical path: something that would not have been apparent in ordinary thresh-holding approaches Basically IMO it's good to use all of these techniques together to get a good picture of your system. In the end the greatest limitation is our human cognition to interpret the results, which frankly needs all the help it can get. |
|