Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pekk 4220 days ago
Why not just "flynn"? Should I really be typing "docker" before every command for the sake of someone's branding?
1 comments

Imagine if git, svn, cvs all installed their own "checkout", "clone", "commit", etc. executables. It would become chaos if you had more than one installed. I prefer when various software suites keep their executables in their own namespace, if only for sake of future-proofing, to prevent naming conflicts.

There are always symlinks and/or shell aliases if you want to override that locally.

That's nice, but it's irrelevant because there are not going to be many "flynn" executables.