Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ryanthejuggler 4211 days ago
The implication is that Bitcoin isn't "real" money.

Never mind that money is a social construct and is useful whenever two parties agree on a common value.

1 comments

I think the implication is actually that the person sending this transaction was also the recipient.
Good point; your explanation makes more sense. I pretty much only use Bitcoin to buy lunch and laptop stickers, so I forget that people with significant amounts of it have to shuffle it like this.