Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by reportingsjr 4216 days ago
If they invent and implement as many things as Bell I'm almost ok with that.

For what it is worth I have seen the effect of google fiber locally (Cincinnati) even though Google has no plans of expanding to here any time soon. Cincinnati Bell recently unveiled a 1Gbps residential plan for $70/mo. This was a response to the city council approaching Google to see what they would need to do to bring fiber here.

2 comments

> If they invent and implement as many things as Bell I'm almost ok with that.

Maybe, but I wouldn't compare Google with Bell Labs directly.

Remember that the only reason we had access to so much of what Bell Labs invented (e.g. Unix) is due to a 1958 antitrust lawsuit which resulted in AT&T being prohibited from profiting off of the computer business entirely[0]. As a result, Bell Labs had to license all technologies (except for telephone-related services) freely.

It wasn't until 1984 when AT&T sold off Bell Labs - almost three decades later. If AT&T had been allowed to profit off of Bell Labs, we might remember Bell Labs's legacy very differently.

If Google were subject to an analogous requirement that would be one thing, but absent that legal restriction, the two situations are very different.

[0] http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch02s01.html

You are very correct. It is still a valuable thing to have a research company where researchers and designers do not have to worry nearly as much about money.

AT&T/Bell Labs was a government regulated monopoly so it is definitely a different situation. AT&T watched very closely what they profited off of and made sure it stayed within the realm of telecommunications for fear of antitrust lawsuits.

Regardless even if no one else can access it for the first decade or two many innovations would still make their way out into other places.

It's only 70/month for the first year and then 80/month after that. Also, they only have 20% coverage of the city so for most of us we're still stuck with the usual slow speeds. And finally their customer service is just as bad (maybe even worse, if that's possible) than Time Warner. I wish they hadn't offered gigabit speeds as I fear that'll slow the arrival of Google fiber which would be so much nicer.