[pillain]

Mean is what we perceive to be a quality of a great leader. We spend half our adolescence dealing with mean people and mom says we will have to for the rest of our lives. We are built on the principle strive to be a better person, strive to be honest and truthful and strive to the best you can be but often we do nothing of the sort. We focus on the unnecessary and not on the real. I’m not sure if its intentional that there is a perception that mean is something that needs to be there to be successful or if mean is the bilateral issue created by the humans we are and perceive to be a part of a strong leader.

It is not what we choose to become but who we are as a person that determines our success. Mean people do fail all the time morally and point proven they fail as founders too. We can continue to discuss what we think is mean but really we should be discussing character. Mean people will fail at least that’s how its supposed to work from a karma standpoint sadly it doesn’t happen. But as a founder, success does depend on the person you are and the environment and culture you create. Fighting is only a force but time and acceleration you are able to go the distance even from zero. That distance you create eventually leads to momentum, which then leads to transcendence. It is changing. For us improving the world is an advantage and for us having a moral standard is advantage. At this point we have an advantage do we become the mean people or the good people. Are we building good character or bad character? To overcome adversity create ingenuity that is unbelievable.