[paul_milovanov]

reposting again from article comments -- I guess I'm just trying to score HN points :)) ========================

Hi Julien! Thanks for engaging in discussion :)

Your argument is certainly reasonable and logical! What I disagree with is the starting premise of "fair == same standard of living == same % of disposable income" and your characterization of candidates not subscribing to that reasoning as "greedy". ("Same standard of living" would make a lot of sense if your company was based in Bangalore and trying to hire in London -- e.g ensuring "minimum standard of living" -- not that you'd be able to hire in London with Bangalore rates.).

You're absolutely right that ultimately it all boils down to what the market will bear, and you're happy with your ability to hire to your desired standard the way you're doing it -- which is great! I'm afraid however that it's a bit overly enthusiastic to say that this has anything to do with whether your compensation policy is fair.

As a candidate, I would expect to at least be told about this compensation policy before spending any time on the interview process -- I'm sure you'll agree, and perhaps start doing so if you're not doing so already :)

Cheers!

P