|
|
|
|
|
by rikf
4225 days ago
|
|
I agree with everything you said. Here is an interesting lwn article from when the azule people originally tried to push their change/enhancements upstream. http://lwn.net/Articles/392307/ Seems like either the quality wasnt there or the linux people where resistant to change. Some more info here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AzulPM/Managed_Runtime_Ini... Its a pitty that this type of GC hasn't found widespread use because it gives us the best of both worlds, in terms of automatics memory management and performance. edit for spelling mistake |
|
The linux people are write to not just exept code from outsider into there most importent subsystems like the scheduler. Azul did more of a code dumb then really try to get patches upstream. If they had taken the time to split up there code into diffrent patches and then take the time to explain why they needed it, why lots of other people also needed it, they might have gotten lot of it threw, or at least get the conversation rolling on what the linux guys could do to make managed runtimes faster.
Its of course also true that managed runtimes are not what linux kernal hackers focus on.
So it boils down to Azul guys not having enougth time to do it right and the linux people were not exited enougth to roll withit themself.
Maybe there was a lot more talk going on in the background, but I at least could not find much more on this.