|
|
|
|
|
by dredmorbius
4230 days ago
|
|
Another thanks here. I use youtube-dl so much that I occasionally substitute it for wget when trying to fetch online content (and occasionally discover in the process that it will in fact grab what it was that I was trying to get in the first place -- mostly audio files). I vastly prefer offline media players to browser-based tools, for a number of reasons: better controls and playback, richer features, uniform features (I don't have to learn each individual site's idiosyncracies), the ability to queue up a set of media from numerous sources and play them back without clobbering one another, and more. Hugely useful tool, and I've been impressed as hell as well by its update frequency. And lift a mug to old Warthog. I miss Joe as well. |
|
Why don't browsers provide some way to play local video files, for example by typing "file:///c:/my_video.flv" into the address bar. After all, the browser certainly includes the ability to play the video being downloaded off the web.
If you try "file:///c:/my_video.flv" with Firefox, it opens a dialog box offering to pass the video file to whatever external media players you have installed.
In what seems inconsistent to me, "file:///c:/my_notes.txt" and "file:///c:/my_pic.jpg" will be rendered correctly by Firefox -- it won't offer to open an external text editor or photo viewer. Why is video different?