[gadfly]

I observed some suspicious spy-like activity by Detekt v.1.1 and added an issue to the Detekt github site:

https://github.com/botherder/detekt/issues/20

The developer immediately closed my report, without discussion and all he could say is: "Trust me. Detekt definitely isn't spyware."

Somehow, this does not make me feel secure.

[userbinator]

detekt.exe imports from WS2_32.DLL "ntohl" function, which shouldn't be a cause for concern, but then shortly after startup it does spawn another instance of itself, which listens... debugging into the child process, I set a breakpoint on all of ws2_32.dll's functions and resume, leading to this:

    0350F024   012D4110  /CALL to socket from _socket.012D410A
    0350F028   00000002  |Family = AF_INET
    0350F02C   00000001  |Type = SOCK_STREAM
    0350F030   00000000  \Protocol = IPPROTO_IP
    0350F034   012DBAD8  _socket.012DBAD8
    0350F038   02D93610
    0350F03C   00000000
    0350F040   00000001
    0350F044   00000002
    0350F048   1E0C18A8  RETURN to python27.1E0C18A8

This leads back to _socket.pyd , sip.pyd, and eventually QtCore4.dll. Tracing a bit further, I see what's happening:

It starts a local Python web server in order to serve the main dialog of the application, the one with the language selector, which is an HTML page embedded in a browser control. No wonder it hung when you denied the connection and showed a blank frame. If you let it continue and figure out where it's listening, you can actually visit the page in your web browser and see the program's dialog. One of the most convoluted ways to display a dialog I've ever seen, and probably worth a "WTF?", but I don't think it's intended to be malicious. The developer could've handled this a bit better, that's for sure.

[libertyboy2007]

I do think it's intended to be malicious!!!

consider that the majority of the people who aim to download and use this THING are those who do something against their government's red lines. This is quiet enough to make this THING a good Trojan horse for hiding anything than can track/detect(detekt!?) an activist. serving the main dialog of the application may be merely a camouflage for other uses of Python inside the file.

any idea?

[gadfly]

Thanks for your great analysis.

The developer has re-opened my report now, which will probably never be addressed anyway, since the UI is so convoluted.

Funny thing is that this 'anti-spyware' app creates more confusion than most of the spyware I've seen. Sadly, most people will just run this thing and think they're safe, since they believe the authorities (eff.org, amnesty) but don't even use a firewall.