[jasonkester]

Money isn't what we're optimizing though. It's freedom.

Having a software product as income source means you don't have to have a day job working for somebody else. It means you can spend your time doing whatever you want, be that working on your own personal projects, surfing, traveling or, yes, earning more money. You can even choose to build open source Mac text editors and give them away for free.

It's your choice what to do with that freedom. The important point is that we, as software developers, are essentially handed that freedom by nature of our skill set.

That's a really cool thing. So while I can see an entitled end-user saying something like the grandparent's "you already have a job that pays you, so give us the output from your nights and weekends for free", it's surprising to see that attitude from somebody who would be most impacted, were that to become a reasonable expectation.

[nl]

Again, you are making a lot of assumptions about the motivation of other people.

Some people crave the recognition a successful open source project gives.

Some want to learn something.

Some want to give a gift to the world.

Some don't want the hassle of supporting software.

Some believe "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need"

[jasonkester]

Indeed. My point is that it's the author's choice, not the end user's.

[agilebyte]

I am not saying that someone should give me products of their labor for free, I am trying to imagine why someone would.

One explanation, like you point out, is that they are free to work on a project such as CotEditor because they are financially secure.