[tptacek]

Neither Rand Paul nor Ted Cruz were going to break with the party on the eve of the GOP's assumption of the senate majority, knowing that in a year or so they're going to be on a stage debating other Republicans in front of the GOP base.

In fact: the more "grassroots-friendly" this bill had been, the less tenable a yea vote would have been, particularly for Paul.

[protomyth]

Paul said it didn't go far enough and had some problems. Cruz has proven he doesn't care what the old guard think.

[waterlesscloud]

Cruz did break with the party.

[tptacek]

D'oh. Thanks for the correction.

[drzaiusapelord]

Because, like Paul, he has the luxury to. If he ever held the tie-breaking vote he sure as hell would vote lockstep with the GOP. These people are "show libertarians," at best.

[lvh]

What would convince you of that fact, or convince you of the contrary?

[wyclif]

Nope. Paul refused to support the bill because of the provisions for the continuance of the Patriot Act into 2017. He's been quite consistent on this, and it really doesn't have anything to do with Senate majorities. I applaud his stand.