|
|
|
|
|
by barnaby
4226 days ago
|
|
>> But still. OTR (and the enhanced/modified version of it TextSecure is using) is probably the easiest to use way to communicate in a reasonably secure fashion, and it'd would be fantastic to see it used by hundreds of millions of users all of a sudden -- even if it's sitting on top of insecure mobile operating systems and untrusted-yet-privileged hardware. Have you had issues getting OTR to connect sometimes?
Myself and about 5 friends have been using OTR with ChatSecure on the phone and pidgin on the desktop. Sometimes the OTR connection just doesn't engage, and we suspect it's because there are multiple instances of the chat client signed in and it like "crosses the streams" or something. CryptoCat has similar issues. Is there a perscribed way of using OTR that won't give us these problems? TextSecure hasn't given us any problems yet ... though, we never see the encrypted text messages in our SMS, even when we use textsecure over google voice. Does TextSecure just bypass actual SMS channels? |
|
[0] https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/UPGRADING-libotr-4.1.0.txt
A simple workaround is to use a different account for each device (e.g. me@jabber.com, me+mobile@jabber.com).
TextSecure's developers recognize that a good multi-device experience is essential to provide a comparable experience to other messaging apps. Their approach is different from OTR's, and is described here [0].
[0] https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/001022....